SCG-HMH · published envelope

SCG-HMH · hybrid plant & TITAN visual

Visual stage is first — use Open visual or scroll to the sim.

TITAN STARSHIP · 120,000 rpm
TITAN 3D · galaxy nav · 120k rpm · ×100 gen
STARSHIP

TITAN starship environment

Loading interactive environment…

Modular generators · LN₂ share
1 LN₂ plant / 100 stacks
P_out total
14.01 MW
P_par total
104 W
P_net fleet
12.84 MW
COP fleet
6×

stack par 73 W · LN₂ par 31 W · module 140 kW each

Vacuum null-energyTITAN isolation
P_null 42.9 kW

Superconducting multi-cavity Casimir-class vacuum stress (ReBCO faces, MHD kerfs, dynamic N52 / ∂B/∂t pump). On TITAN the isolation axiom traps null energy in the magnetosphere and plasma envelopes — it has nowhere else to go.

Ė_neg
39.9 kW
Stored |U|
0.7 kJ
Envelope Q
1.35
Cavities / dyn
16.4 · ×2.44

n_cav 16.4 · dyn×2.44 · SC 0.80 · Ė_neg 39.88 kW · P_null 42.88 kW · ion×0.38

TITAN isolation · null-energy charging envelopes · Q=1.35 · |U|=0.7 kJ

FTL bubble · distance jumpjump-ready
ready 55% · w×1.43

Bubble wall critical — distance jump available within budget.

Jump range
0.038 ly
Bubble R
146 m
Budget / cost
1329.7 / 0.1 kJ
fil × star
×1.33 · ×1.07
Local hop353.0 AU · 0.0 kJ · OK
System transit0.017 ly · 0.0 kJ · OK
Max jump0.037 ly · 0.1 kJ · OK

R_bub 146m · w×1.43 · d_jump 0.037 ly · Q=1.35 · fil×1.33 · star×1.07 · budget 1329.7 kJ

Backwards time · CTC ΔTdeep-time
vs 140 kW · jump 0.038 ly

Deep-time band — ΔT 8.737 Myr toward 9.7 Gyr alignment horizon.

ΔT back
104.00 kyr
E_ex / m_neg
2.25e+17 J
2.50e+0 kg
Throat
OPEN · 82.3 m
28k fleet ΔT
1.67 Gyr
Space–time figure: 3.90e+3 ly·yr · budget 1.07e-1% of full-ship 2.10×10²⁰ J · |u|≈35727 J/m³
Lattice seed436870.76 yr · OK
Local CTC hop2.184 Myr · OK
Max ΔT (this plant)8.737 Myr · OK
Full-ship 28k proj.1.666 Gyr · OK

ΔT 8.737 Myr · E_ex 2.25e+17 J · m_neg 2.50e+0 kg · budget 1.07e-1% · throat OPEN · jump 0.037 ly · P 140.1 kW

Anchors: u=−40 kJ/m³ · E_full=2.10×10²⁰ J · m_neg=2328 kg · 150 m throat · 9.7 Gyr horizon · DPMG Φ− ocean · Isolation Axiom.

Physics viability93.0% · third
vs output 140 kW

High internal consistency: free inventory, ionization chain, and envelope align under stated physics.

p(viable)
93.0%
Supported P
110 kW
Extended P
29.7 kW
Support frac
79%
Passive ionization chain· η_ion 78% · N52×1.10 · ReBCO_e 0.85 · Marx×4.59
79%
N₂ density & chamber pressure· ρ×10.11 · 5.5 bar · trap 82%
81%
Engineering mitigations live· 23/23 · arch 75% · TITAN sinks
85%
Rotor structural envelope· rpm 120,000 · bare hoop ~107,400 · corset ~130,300 · corset band · mitigations 100%
92%
Electrode geometric packing· MHD pitch 30.1 mm · Marx×16 in LN₂-insulated chamber
95%
Vacuum null-energy (TITAN isolation)· isolation axiom · envelope Q=1.35 · P_null 42.88 kW · SC 0.80
98%
Aux / parasitic bookkeeping· P_net 140.1 kW · P_par 0.002 kW
98%
MHD + ReBCO extraction path· σ 152864 S/m · η_MHD 100% · ReBCO couple 2.84 · pads×24 Marx×16
100%
Rotor kinematic drive· Tip 1257 m/s · gate 1.00
100%
Free exergy vs heat-path claim· W_ex 107577.7 kW · third-share claim 140.1 kW · ratio 768.06
100%
Bare-nuclei / V6 path consistency· Bare path idle — third-regime bookkeeping
100%

P_hyb 140.1 kW · supported 79% · p_viable 93.0% · third

Novelty is not a penalty — only conservation, envelope, and the stated causal chain score.

Visual effects

Slide each layer on/off. Marx controls electrode arcs and seed flashes.

Hybrid output
140 kW
MHD 25%ReBCO 75%
P_net · COP_aux
140 kW
61k×
P_MHD35.0 kW
P_ReBCO×4105 kW
Heat / exergy
Q_waste96.2 kW
W_exergy (CMB)107.58 MW
T_sink2.7 K CMB
Utilization0%
P_par2 W
V6 Magnum Opus · multiphysics M-stack
P = 92 kW × M · bare blend 0%
M (live)
×5271.9
P_V6
140 kW
P_par (V6)
9.1 W
COP_aux
61k×
shear (v/vb)²×1.00
height h/0.1×4.00
f_preheat×3.65
f_backEMF×5.30
f_Marx×1.80
σ_jump/10×17.06
plant synergy×2.21

M = shear × height × f_pre × f_backEMF × f_Marx × (σ_jump/10) × plant_synergy. f_Marx and plant scale continuously past 1 kHz with all levers. Third-regime ~92 kW at 120k; bare-nuclei path unlocks above baseline RPM toward ~141 MW / COP ~10⁷ at 200k. Parasitics itemized in watts (bearing + Marx + stator).

Regen / cryo
×1.04
Density / P
×1.23
Conductivity σ
×1.41
RPM kinetic
×1.11
MHD extract
×1.27
ReBCO×4
×1.19
Heat / exergy
×1.16
Parasitic cut
×0.95
Structure
×1.04
AI / control
×1.04
Flow / jets
×1.14
Volume / zone
×1.15
1 Thermal regeneration loop4%
2 Backflow densification loop15%
3 Rotor–plasma EMF loop28%
4 AI adaptive control loop3%
5 Grid heat recycling loop18%
6 Shared tank stability loop7%
7 Conductivity avalanche loop28%
8 MHD self-pump loop41%
9 Plasma heat recycle loop16%
10 Flux-pinning / corset loop4%
11 Expansion / nozzle jet loop54%
12 ReBCO induction harvest loop24%
13 Spinning-EMF magnetic ring trap64%
14 Marx electrode geometry × Hz22%
15 AI heat-grid oracle multi-lock5%
16 N52 alt-B passive ionization66%
17 ReBCO back-EMF electrification37%
Strongest pairs
Plasma σ × avalanche stack100%
σ avalanche ↔ Marx duty76%
Cascaded MHD ↔ ionization zone66%
Cascaded MHD ↔ self-pump59%
σ avalanche ↔ chamber pressure58%
ReBCO ↔ rotor–plasma EMF55%
Plasma heat recycle ↔ waste heat52%
Neutral density ↔ positive P_N247%